‘Completely false’: Electoral fee rubbishes United Australia Occasion declare that hundreds of thousands didn’t vote

CheckMate is a weekly publication from RMIT FactLab which recaps the most recent on this planet of reality checking and misinformation, drawing on the work of FactLab and its sister organisation, RMIT ABC Reality Test.

You may learn the most recent version under, and subscribe to have the subsequent publication delivered straight to your inbox.

CheckMate June 3, 2022

This week, CheckMate delves into among the predictable, incorrect claims of electoral fraud shared within the aftermath of the federal ballot.

We additionally reveal whose tweets have been the preferred of the marketing campaign, and analyse two modifications to Victorian legal guidelines that set off a wave of viral misinformation.

Election disinformation at ‘very low ranges’, AEC says

The Australian Electoral Fee says the extent of incorrect and deceptive data being shared in relation to the latest federal election is constant to say no two weeks on from the ballot that noticed Labor returned to energy after virtually 10 years.

A spokeswoman for the AEC informed CheckMate that the variety of disinformation narratives had been “very minimal”, echoing a information launch dated Could 27 by which electoral commissioner Tom Rogers famous that the week instantly after the vote had featured “very low ranges of electoral disinformation”.

“Whereas a really small variety of people have chosen to have interaction in selling predictable and disappointing conspiracy theories, I am more than happy to report that the overwhelming majority of Australians are selecting to not have interaction with these items,” Mr Rogers mentioned.

The place election misinformation has been shared, the AEC — and reality checkers — have been fast to quash it.

On-line, the AEC has refuted dozens of claims about voter turnout, the counting course of and the usage of the Nice Seal of the Commonwealth on official election writs.

A suggestion, for example, that greater than 4 million eligible voters (round one-quarter of individuals enrolled to vote in Australia) did not prove for the election was rubbished by the Fee.

In response to the United Australia Occasion, which made the declare in an electronic mail despatched to members within the week following the election, the determine represented the “highest quantity of people that have didn’t prove for voting since 1922”.

The AEC, nevertheless, labelled that suggestion “completely false”.

“The quantity being quoted right here is a particularly untimely point-in-time variety of poll papers counted by the AEC just below one week into the rely,” the Fee’s election disinformation register states.

“It’s not an correct measure of electoral turnout and shouldn’t be in contrast with turnout figures from earlier elections, which have been produced in spite of everything poll papers had been obtained and counted.”

As for the vote-counting course of, the Fee debunked incorrect claims that counting had been outsourced, and explained {that a} photograph showing to indicate a disorganised and chaotic counting course of at one polling sales space as a substitute depicted AEC employees utilising restricted area to type and unfold ballots previous to vote counting.

‘Completely false’: Electoral fee rubbishes United Australia Occasion declare that hundreds of thousands didn’t vote
Down for the rely: After a involved voter posted this photograph on Twitter to recommend the election could possibly be rigged, the AEC replied that generally “extra area is required” for the sorting of ballots.(Provided: Twitter)

On Fb, in the meantime, some customers urged the AEC “rigged” the election by “ignoring” voters’ preferences and distributing votes solely to the 2 main events.

Nonetheless, these claims have been a mischaracterisation of Australia’s voting system and the Fee’s counting course of.

As FactLab defined, the AEC conducts an preliminary two-candidate-preferred rely on election night time in an effort to provide an early indication of which get together will kind authorities, with subsequent counts of the ballots then distributing preferences in response to voter priorities.

Lastly, when it got here to claims that election writs issued by the Lawyer-Common have been invalid as a result of they lacked the Nice Seal, the AEC patiently pointed out that the seal was not a authorized requirement for the writs.

How the ‘teals’ toppled their rivals

As a part of its Mosaic election monitoring venture, RMIT FactLab analysed how two high-profile “teal” independents outmanoeuvred and unseated their political opponents with the assistance of efficient social media campaigns.

In Melbourne’s Goldstein voters, outgoing Liberal MP Tim Wilson and former ABC journalist Zoe Daniel adopted starkly totally different on-line approaches, with the latter amplifying native voices and focusing on younger voters.

Zoe Daniel campaigning
Zoe Daniel amplified native voices and focused younger voters in her marketing campaign to win the Melbourne seat of Goldstein.(Provided: Fb)

FactLab’s evaluation discovered that Mr Wilson relied closely on Liberal Occasion speaking factors and repeatedly attacked the credibility of his rival and her supporters, whereas Ms Daniel’s messaging remained largely constructive but centered on voter dissatisfaction with perceived authorities inaction on local weather change, gender equality and integrity in politics.

Along with publishing dozens of posts per day, Ms Daniel and her staff spent at the least six instances greater than Mr Wilson on social media promoting.

Nonetheless, her prices have been significantly decrease than these of different profitable impartial candidates, at the least partly because of her efficient use of video.

In the meantime, within the close by voters of Kooyong — the place the advert spend of the 2 lead candidates was 31 instances larger than that of the Goldstein rivals — FactLab discovered Dr Monique Ryan’s use of TikTok could have helped win voters within the seat’s largest age demographic: younger individuals aged 18 to 34.

Practically 60 TikTok movies created by Dr Ryan and a volunteer-run account referred to as ‘Youth4Mon’ attracted a mixed 730,000-plus views.

Whereas one of many solely two TikToks posted by opponent Josh Frydenberg garnered greater than 175,000 views, this will have been because of a cameo from common AFL star Bailey Smith (who gave the impression to be making mild of Mr Frydenberg’s lack of hair within the video).

FactLab additionally concluded that Dr Ryan’s messaging, just like that of Ms Daniel, was overwhelmingly constructive when in comparison with Mr Frydenberg’s promoting, which hardly ever talked about Dr Ryan by title however typically questioned her independence.

Attending to the core of fruit and veggie falsehood

Social media was not too long ago set abuzz with claims that Victorians can be banned from rising fruit and greens, with US podcaster Joe Rogan amongst these to fall for the lie.

“Premier Dan Andrews is passing a invoice that prohibits individuals from rising their very own meals”, learn one viral submit shared throughout Twitter, Fb and Instagram, whereas one other submit claimed the brand new guidelines can be “implement[d] with drones”.

However as RMIT FactLab discovered, such claims are excessive on fertiliser.

Harry checks the tomatoes growing in the vegetable garden.
Victorians are nonetheless allowed to develop their very own tomatoes, regardless of what Joe Rogan mentioned.(612 ABC Brisbane: Jessica Hinchliffe)

The Victorian authorities’s proposed Agriculture Laws Modification Invoice 2022 seeks to amend varied current legal guidelines regarding business agricultural and meals manufacturing.

A significant focus of the invoice is defending the state’s biosecurity, for instance, by rising the federal government’s inspection and enforcement powers “to raised regulate the danger of introduction or unfold of noxious weeds and pest animals”.

Different modifications search to cease plant pests and ailments from coming into Victoria, or to restrict the usage of pesticides and different chemical compounds.

A spokesperson for Agriculture Victoria informed FactLab that the invoice makes no reference to residence gardens and that “nobody will probably be prevented from rising their very own meals as a part of these modifications, that are designed to assist the agricultural sector”.

Professor Paul Martin, director of the Australian Centre for Agriculture and Regulation, mentioned the notion that Victorians would not be capable of develop their very own meals was “improper” and that such interpretations of the invoice have been “misguided”.

In the meantime, business group the Victorian Farmers Federation has referred to as out misinformation that it says “misrepresents and misinterprets the amendments set out within the Invoice”.

CoronaCheck: Well being officers granted authorized immunity, however there is no ‘cover-up’

Dozens of protesters stand outside the Parliament of Victoria, as police stand on the steps.
Protesters on the steps of the Victorian Parliament in November final yr.(AAP: Joel Carrett)

Nonetheless in Victoria, the state authorities has been attacked for shielding its well being bureaucrats from being sued over public well being selections, with one broadly shared tweet labelling the transfer “probably the most surprising political cover-up in Australian historical past”.

That includes video of an impartial state MP railing in opposition to since-legislated amendments to Victoria’s well being legal guidelines, in addition to lockdowns and vaccine mandates, the tweet claimed the modifications would “give the Chief Well being Officer full immunity for the previous 2 years”.

So, what does the regulation really say?

The supply in query, part 227AA of the Public Well being and Wellbeing Act 2008, certainly grants authorized immunity to the Chief Well being Officer and different officers “for something completed or omitted to be completed in good religion” underneath the auspices of the Act or its laws (together with something completed with the cheap perception that the regulation allowed or required it).

Deakin College regulation professor Matthew Groves informed CheckMate that the change “codifies and clarifies” immunity that “in apply” already existed, and defined that the brand new provision transfers any private legal responsibility to the state authorities.

On April 7, Labor MP Tien Kieu informed parliament the modification “is not going to impression on the proceedings which are occurring at current within the courts or within the authorized system”.

Professor Groves mentioned though the regulation was silent on whether or not the brand new provision would apply retrospectively, “for instances that haven’t been commenced, the presumption is that this immunity would virtually actually apply”.

Importantly, such authorized protections for officers weren’t “distinctive”, he mentioned, highlighting near-identical clauses contained within the Ambulances Companies Act 1986 (s22) and the Assisted Reproductive Therapy Act 2008 (ss 94, 110), amongst different legal guidelines.

Patrick Emerton, an affiliate regulation professor at Deakin College, pointed to comparable protections in different states.

For instance, he mentioned, the NSW Public Well being Act 2010 (s133) “confers private immunity in comparable although barely extra slender phrases than the Victorian Act”.

Notably, whereas the Victorian regulation protects particular person officers, it doesn’t defend the state authorities itself from legal responsibility.

That stands in distinction to the Commonwealth Biosecurity Act 2015 (s644), which Dr Emerton defined “removes the best to sue the Commonwealth authorities in addition to a person officer”.

Edited by Ellen McCutchan and David Campbell, with because of Ewa Staszewska

Received a proven fact that wants checking? Tweet us @ABCFactCheck or ship us an electronic mail at [email protected]

Blue Judith Nielson Institute logo
This text is supported by funding from the Judith Neilson Institute for Journalism and Concepts(Judith Nielson Institute)

Posted , up to date